In this blog post, we respond to questions from a friend, who has been following this blog.
“I sincerely thank you for all your valuable input on SUKAD blogs; I refer to it when I have some inquiries and it is really always interesting. I have a question; I need your expertise and support in; I didn’t know how to reach you so if you don’t mind I am sending it to you by email.
… What is the difference between a Project Management Methodology, Framework and Standard. Is the framework the same as the standard? I have read in various links that PRINCE2 along with Agile, Scrum, Waterfall are types of Project Management Methodologies and I read on SUKAD Blog that PMBOK is a framework (a guide).
I wanted to ask you is that in Microsoft Dynamics CRM and ERP implementation there is a tool that we use called Microsoft Dynamics Sure Step Implementation Methodology and there is also the Microsoft Solutions Framework (MSF); how do we relate these to the PRINCE2 or PMBOK?”
Microsoft Dynamics … Solutions Framework
In this area, we do not have the expertise. We mention it here in case readers have expertise in this area and would like to write about it. We would be happy to publish as a Guest Author’s article.
Framework vs. Standard vs. Methodology
The word ‘standard’ could be many things.
Dictionary definition: “something used as a measure, norm, or model in comparative evaluations”
- It can be anything that an organization establishes for their internal work … as a standard … meaning … for their employees to follow. In this scenario, the organization usually mandates the use of the standard; although optional standards could exist.
- The most common use of the term ‘standard’ usually refers to something (documents) a professional organization establishes for others to use. For example, there are engineering standards, programing standards, and standards for numerous areas of practice.
- It is also common that some countries have standards’ issuing authorities that they publish their own standards or sanction the standards that other publish.
- For project management standards, many organizations publish standards. These include:
Here are some more notes about ‘standards’
- A standard could be a guide or a methodology …. PRINCE2 is a standard methodology whereas PMBOK is a standard guide
- A standard could be obligatory or optional, depends on their use.
- Often, professionals chose what standard to follow, assuming their organizations have not adopted one
- In engineering and some other technical domains, standards could also be ‘codes’ and/or mandated by law.
- For project management, there are no laws that govern the use of standards or what standard to use so one can use them or not.
Dictionary definition: “a basic structure underlying a system, concept, or text” 
Sometime we use the words ‘Framework’ and ‘Guide’ interchangeably, but that is not 100% accurate; in our professional opinion they are quite similar but not the same. It is too hard to explain the differences so let us assume they are the same for the purpose of this article.
A Framework is a general guideline that an organization can adopt. The Framework could include many components. For example, PMBOK Guide presents processes and knowledge areas, along with project life cycle, stakeholders, project organizations, among other topics. The PMBOK offers guidelines on how to develop a scope statement, a WBS, an estimate, a communication plan; therefore, PMI labels the PMBOK Guide as a framework for managing a single project.
Other examples: ISO 31000 offers a framework for managing organizational risks. IPMA offers us with a Competence Framework … there are other examples. To summarize, a framework offer suggestions for organizations to implement so their teams can use.
Only part of Chapter 3 in PMBOK 4th edition is the ANSI standard; in PMBOK 5th edition, the standard is now an appendix. In other words, the standard is only about 30 to 40 pages out of about 600 pages. In short, the PMBOK include the standard that ANSI approves, and the other sections by developed by the volunteers as the rest of the Framework.
Dictionary definition: “a system of methods used in a particular area of study or activity” 
A methodology is different from a framework since a methodology — come from method — means there has to be a certain way of doing something; like systematic process.
A common project management methodology follows a project life cycle or something like that.
- PRINCE2 is a Standard Methodology.
- SUKAD developed a methodology that we call CAM2P
(The Customizable and Adaptable Methodology for Managing Projects ); we have published a few articles explaining part of this methodology
Usually one do not hear about project management methodologies much since these would be custom built for an organization. In telecom, a famous methodology is PROPS-C (Ericsson).
Is a methodology also a standard?
It can be if an organization adopts a methodology it become their standard. Such as PRINCE2, PROPS-C, … For example, in SUKAD we use the CAM2P
Which one to use
Should we use a methodology, a framework, a guide, or what?
To summarize, a methodology (project life cycle) is not enough to manage projects effectively. The same is true about the PMI Framework (we published a few articles on this). Refer to the image at the right.
The rest of your questions
“I have read in various links that PRINCE2 along with Agile, Scrum, Waterfall are types of Project Management Methodologies”
- Waterfall – is a name that people use for a methodology that fallow the waterfall approach … it is mostly like a project life cycle where the results from one phase will drop, like a waterfall, into the next phase. As you know, water drops but do not go back up – meaning we go forward with no possibility of going back. Some would label SUKAD CAM2P
as a waterfall, but that is not correct since some phases and stages in CAM2P overlap …, and if we must, we can return to a prior phase (re-evaluate the work) and yes there is a sequence but the ‘waterfall’ term is not appropriate.
- I am not too knowledgeable about SCRUM and Agile but what I know about them is that they are NOT project management methodologies even though their advocates claim they are. What I know about them is that they are software development methodologies — so a very specific form. I realize that agile publicist claim Agile is good for all type of projects but what I read and understand – that is not accurate.